Re: Column Redaction
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Column Redaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+1B_f4k56d44DEa-5n0j-yxQTKFgxK8PGS8x5VLQ7SdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Column Redaction (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Column Redaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 October 2014 21:03, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote: >> So you're familiar then with this process? So you know that an auditor >> would trigger an investigation, resulting in deeper surveillance and >> gathering of evidence that ends with various remedial actions, such as >> court. How would that process start then, if not this way? > > I've seen lots of such investigations fail because the evidence wasn't > strong enough to link to a particular person, but rather a computer > terminal or something like that. So your solution to the evidence problem is to do nothing? Or you have a better suggestion? Nothing is certain, apart from doing nothing. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: