Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobzrGnGr9PYF-hYbDuayQg_eGq=JdgddqDp7d+4uzfm=Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Actually, I think we do. If I want to test against 7.4, ISTM I want > to test against the last released 7.4 version, not something with > arbitrary later changes. Otherwise, what exactly is the point? 1. You're free to check out any commit you like. 2. Nothing I said can reasonably be confused with "let's allow arbitrary later changes." > Uh, don't we have that already? I know you can configure a buildfarm > animal to force a run at least every-so-often, but it's not required, > and I don't think it's even the default. Oh, OK. I wonder how that plays with the buildfarm status page's desire to drop old results that are more than 30 days old. I guess you'd just need to force a run at least every 28 days or something. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: