Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobyH58vz9noKmk5j-n=ZGttn_xL=k9OztLvYZRPYBCdsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > While going through numutils.c I found the following thing: > --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c > +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ pg_ltoa(int32 value, char *a) > * Avoid problems with the most negative integer not being representable > * as a positive integer. > */ > - if (value == (-2147483647 - 1)) > + if (value == PG_INT32_MIN) > { > memcpy(a, "-2147483648", 12); > return; > Attached is a patch. The interesting part is that pg_lltoa is not > missing the check on PG_INT64_MIN. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: