Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobxA-b8sZey9wvcFND9P3W2Pub1haatpg5pfRKZ-6sA8w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits (yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)) |
| Ответы |
Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits
Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:37 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote: >> Yes, I would expect that. What kind of increase are you seeing? Is >> it causing a problem for you, or are you just making an observation? > > i was curious because my application uses async commits mainly to > avoid frequent fsync. i have no numbers right now. Oh, that's interesting. Why do you want to avoid frequent fsyncs? I thought the point of synchronous_commit=off was to move the fsyncs to the background, but not necessarily to decrease the frequency. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: