Re: Relation extension scalability
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Relation extension scalability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobwq3R=g9Sy0zJqw8b+dMvz3HcuSpzmaZQFmExOwteHjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Relation extension scalability (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Relation extension scalability
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > Attaching new version v18 > > - Some cleanup work on v17. > - Improved UpdateFreeSpaceMap function. > - Performance and space utilization are same as V17 Looks better. Here's a v19 that I hacked on a bit. Unfortunately, one compiler I tried this with had a pretty legitimate complaint: hio.c: In function ‘RelationGetBufferForTuple’: hio.c:231:20: error: ‘freespace’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] hio.c:185:7: note: ‘freespace’ was declared here hio.c:231:20: error: ‘blockNum’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] hio.c:181:14: note: ‘blockNum’ was declared here There's nothing whatsoever to prevent RelationExtensionLockWaiterCount from returning 0. It's also rather ugly that the call to UpdateFreeSpaceMap() assumes that the last value returned by PageGetHeapFreeSpace() is as good as any other, but maybe we can just install a comment explaining that point; there's not an obviously better approach that I can see. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: