Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobwJi561ioqUaeA1ARih3g2TzzTXXazu-3TqyvS-W12kg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 4:00 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Said user-facing documentation largely fails to explain that the
> set of wait events can be enlarged by extensions; that needs to
> be fixed, too.

Is that true? How can they do that? I thought they were stuck with
PG_WAIT_EXTENSION.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.