Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobvN76TmvhK97KC3OU8fbVW-BhTB+g_hgGXDVEdavrzLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is really nice work, so I have committed this version. I > made a few fairly minor changes, hopefully without breaking anything > in the process: > > - I adjusted things for recent commits around INT{32,63}_{MIN_MAX}. > - I removed (void) ssup; which I do not think is normal PostgreSQL style. > - Removed the #if DEC_DIGITS != 4 check. The comment is great, but I > think we don't need protect against #if 0 code get re-enabled. > - I removed the too-clever (at least IMHO) handing of TRACE_SORT in > favor of just using #ifdef around each occurrence. > - I also declared trace_sort in guc.h, where various other GUCs are > declared, instead of declaring it privately in each file that needed > it. > - Changed some definitions to depend on SIZEOF_DATUM rather than > USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL. Hopefully I didn't muff this; please check it. > - Fixed an OID conflict. > - And of course, bumped catversion. And that's broken the buildfarm. Argh. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: