Re: per-statement-level INSTEAD OF triggers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: per-statement-level INSTEAD OF triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobuXtVFczo5TZJVoPUYDZObL4v30X_N49P9FY7a-SMyLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | per-statement-level INSTEAD OF triggers (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: per-statement-level INSTEAD OF triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > I'm asking out of curiosity, do anyone know why we don't have > per-statement-level INSTEAD OF triggers? I looked into the > standard SQL (20xx draft), but I can't find the restriction > such that INSTEAD OF triggers must be row-level. Is there > any technical difficulties, or other reasons for the current > implementation? I think one problem is that the trigger wouldn't have any way of knowing the specifics of what the user was trying to do. It would just know the type of operation (INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE). I guess that could be useful to someone, but not all that useful. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: