Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobuTx+Ck9orX_Yen=Z764Zmsv7cSCVi6OMoMR7myoQLGA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] What's with all the fflush(stderr) calls in pg_standby.c?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > This looks like cargo-cult programming to me. stderr is almost > always line-buffered, making these fflush'es pointless. If it's > not line-buffered, that's probably because it's going to a > noninteractive destination for which this wouldn't matter. > Moreover, none of our other programs do this. On a related note, the idea of removing pg_standby altogether has been proposed a few times. Apparently there are a few things that it still does better than standby_mode, but nobody seems in a hurry to do anything about that. Still, I'd be against spending a lot of time trying to improve a tool that has mostly outlived its usefulness - we ought to be trying to enhance the in-core facilities instead. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: