Re: Syntax for partitioning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Syntax for partitioning
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobu2wHerwHBiAyxb3yAWhHeAUZGEiWFXtoYsH8OVW-ERA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Syntax for partitioning  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
>>
>> So will this be revived any time soon?  Were there any subsequent
>> proposals which were posted?
>>
>
> there was an updated patch, you can find in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20100114181323.9A33.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
>
> not sure what happens after that.

I reviewed a later version here:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-07/msg00183.php

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Concurrent CREATE TABLE/DROP SCHEMA leaves inconsistent leftovers
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: const correctness