Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobtv_vBJhuEOWevJ77GazMkhG+YzbNoavRRWZFXUMkwbg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I didn't really read the patch in any detail, but those things > hopped out at me. Thanks for the reviews. Here is a new version. Changes: - doc: Add an entry to the table of system views, per Tom. - doc: Wrap reference to "<anonymous>" in <literal> tags, per self-review. - doc: Note that off is NULL for <anonymous> allocations, per Andres. - doc: Remove extra "or" at the end of a sentence, per self-review. - doc: Note that the view is by default super-user only, per both Tom and Andres. - code: Declare values/nulls arrays only once at function scope instead of 3x, and tighten up code, per Andres and self-review. - dat: Mark as volatile, per Tom and Andres and Michael. Non-changes: - I didn't add a comment saying that there would be only one entry for anonymous and free memory, as requested by Andres, because it seemed like that's what users would expect anyway and I couldn't think of a way of saying it that didn't sound dumb. - I didn't expand the comment for the C function pg_get_shmem_allocations, as requested by Michael, because I agree with Andres that there doesn't seem to be anything particularly helpful to say there. I'll go ahead and commit this if nobody has further comments. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: