Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobt5iCL=Ar8sjY=iwtZF4FwvbPe4w6ZH20Qwgf8J5Wc3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> In general, I think the definition of these query functions ought to >>> be "what was the value of this parameter when the connection was made". >>> As such, I'm not even sure that the pgunixsocket behavior that's in >>> PQhost now is a good idea, much less that we should extend that hack >>> to cover DefaultHost. > >> Well, returning /tmp on Windows is just stupid. I don't see why we >> should feel bad about changing that. A bug is a bug. > > What I was suggesting was we should take out the pgunixsocket fallback, > not make it even more complicated. That probably implies that we need > still another accessor function to get the socket path. Well, I guess. I have a hard time seeing whatever rejiggering we want to do in master as a reason not to back-patch that fix, though. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: