Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobsn0xYj5osCKNpEDCJ5ccHMOo=kC3HojJbUjzhFZqusw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > You are right. I have changed the ordering and passed OuterUserId via > FixedParallelState. This looks a little strange: + SetCurrentRoleId(fps->outer_user_id, fps->is_current_user_superuser); The first argument says "outer" but the second says "current". I'm wondering if we can just make the second one is_superuser. I'm also wondering if, rather than using GetConfigOptionByName, we should just make the GUC underlying is_superuser non-static and use the value directly. If not, then I'm alternatively wondering whether we should maybe use a less-generic name than varval. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: