Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobp=c7vwW3FdbsnTZeb9GVe88KXbYjy=7ED-CzMKKSoyw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: loss of transactions in streaming replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> OK, so this is an artifact of the changes to make libpq communication >> bidirectional. But I'm still confused about where the error is coming >> from. In your OP, you wrote "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver >> detects an error while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits >> ERROR even if there are data available in the receive buffer." So >> that implied to me that this is only going to trigger if you have a >> shutdown together with an awkwardly-timed error. But your scenario >> for reproducing this problem doesn't seem to involve an error. > > Yes, my scenario doesn't cause any real error. My original description was > misleading. The following would be closer to the truth: > > "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver detects the termination of replication > connection while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits ERROR > even if there are data available in the receive buffer." Ah, OK. I think I now agree that this is a bug and that we should fix and back-patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: