Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (wasChanged SRF in targetlist handling) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoboiMYk1jTL-=2a0iukktCoDnKHMhrQ9za8JrMvkFdYUw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Implement targetlist SRFs using ROWS FROM() (was Changed SRF in targetlist handling)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> That worked quite well. So we have a few questions, before I clean this >> up: > >> - For now the node is named 'Srf' both internally and in explain - not >> sure if we want to make that something longer/easier to understand for >> others? Proposals? TargetFunctionScan? SetResult? > > "Srf" is ugly as can be, and unintelligible. SetResult might be OK. The operation we're performing here, IIUC, is projection. SetResult lacks a verb, although Set could be confused with one; someone might think this is the node that sets a result, whatever that means. Anyway, I suggest working Project in there somehow. If Project by itself seems like it's too generic, perhaps ProjectSet or ProjectSetResult would be suitable. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: