Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoboWs6UPvkm5RENmQ9BNQxVAr6uYOHdR+FwvO1KNj13vw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Re: [HACKERS] Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/3/17 11:52 PM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> We will need to make CURRENT_DATABASE a reserved keyword. But I like >> this idea more than COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE. > > We already have the reserved key word CURRENT_CATALOG, which is the > standard spelling. But I wouldn't be bothered if we made > CURRENT_DATABASE somewhat reserved as well. Maybe I'm just lacking in imagination, but what's the argument against spelling it CURRENT DATABASE? AFAICS, that doesn't require reserving anything new at all, and it also looks more SQL-ish to me. SQL generally tries to emulate English, and I don't normally speak_hyphenated_words. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: