Re: 9.5 release notes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobnViZg1AaUbmCn_01sPypYp4eek9LLDfGTLN3wb+SH1g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 release notes (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 release notes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Can you put your suggestions here in the form of a patch to the release notes? > > The attached patch generalizes from the 9.2 release note wording. I > use the word "inlined" here too, even though commit 5ea86e6e6 did not > do too much with inlining of C code (unlike the 9.2 stuff that went in > a little after SortSupport itself). > > Seems better to be consistent with the earlier item, and it is still > probably in some sense true, because the new SortSupport-wise inlined > comparator probably benefits from inlining more than the historic > scanKey-wise inlined comparator, due to the removal of indirection. OK, but how about this wording instead? diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml index 4086c6b..5e8cc15 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml @@ -221,6 +221,15 @@ <listitem> <para> + Extend the infrastructure allow sorting to be performed by inlined, + non-<acronym>SQL</acronym>-callable comparison functions to cover + <command>CREATE INDEX</>, <command>REINDEX</>, and + <command>CLUSTER</> (Peter Geoghegan) + </para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para> Improve in-memory hash performance (Tomas Vondra, Robert Haas) </para> </listitem> BTW, shouldn't Andrew also be credited here, since he did the work on datum sorts? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: