Re: advance local xmin more aggressively

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
>> committed, and fixing those bugs.
> So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?

Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find
the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for
that.  But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody
notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company