Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobkxXx4X5TokKyNT-C4Sg7MCOt9vhjgnog9yQiOEOq26A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > I had in mind a ereport(WARNING) in create_syncrep_config. Extra > thoughts/opinions welcome. I think for v10 we should just document the behavior we've got; I think it's too late to be whacking things around now. For v11, we could emit a warning if we plan to deprecate and eventually remove the syntax without ANY/FIRST, but let's not do: WARNING: what you did is ok, but you might have wanted to do something else First of all, whether or not that can properly be called a warning is highly debatable. Also, if you do that sort of thing to your spouse and/or children, they call it "nagging". I don't think users will like it any more than family members do. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: