Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobjp4zgy-vRznJ2NEZJBjgfTXEP1PRZnAQrgNfW=mJkaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: >>> A mishandled encoding conversion could be problematic, so that needs to >>> be carefully considered (perhaps just shut off unconditionally). > >> It's not really a problem for the postmaster if something just plain >> old fails. Where we get into trouble is if it manages to (a) crash, >> (b) take an excessive amount of time to complete, or (c) screw up the >> postmaster state in some way we can't recover from. But if any of >> those are an issue then, yeah, just shut it off. > > Keep in mind that in the postmaster, elog(ERROR) *is* a crash. Right... but a function that returns -1 to indicate that something didn't work should be OK, as long as whatever it does is otherwise extremely boring. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: