Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobiJZSmYS7ieFTHaCS8kDWwfAVwE-BaLGcjGbdGax75Xg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: > Certainly easier, but I don't think it'd be better. Matviews really aren't > the same thing as tables. Off-hand (without reviewing the patch), update and > delete counts certainly wouldn't make any sense. "Insert" counts might, in > as much as it's how many rows have been added by refreshes. You'd want a > refresh count too. Regular REFRESH truncates the view and repopulates it, but REFRESH CONCURRENTLY does inserts, updates, and deletes as needed to adjust the contents. So I think all the same counters that make sense for regular tables are also sensible here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: