Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobhzmbvxghvDUvS_7-7+EYjLeXuH1_8kjyMBQxsLB1pRA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values (Adrian Vondendriesch <adrian.vondendriesch@credativ.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Adrian Vondendriesch <adrian.vondendriesch@credativ.de> wrote: > Am 06.11.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Robert Haas: >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Adrian.Vondendriesch >> <Adrian.Vondendriesch@credativ.de> wrote: >>> New patch attached and rebased on HEAD >>> (8c75ad436f75fc629b61f601ba884c8f9313c9af). >> >> I've committed this with some modifications: >> >> - I changed the comment for the half_rounded() macros because the one >> you had just restated the code. >> - I tightened up the coding in numeric_half_rounded() very slightly. >> - You didn't, as far as I can see, modify the regression test schedule >> to execute the files you added. I consolidated them into one file, >> added it to the schedule, and tightened up the SQL a bit. > > Looks much better now. > >> >> Thanks for the patch, and please let me know if I muffed anything. > > Thanks for reviewing and improving the changes. > > I changed the status to committed. Great, thank you for working on this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: