Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partition constraints.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partition constraints. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobh_cVzo6R+UhM-G6sM_-NLfVYmW8iUZPGQgn0gS5amLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generate partition constraints. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix a bug in how we generatepartition constraints.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> >> Hmm, we were discussing this stuff a few days ago, see >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170109182800.qrkae62kmur3gfeg@alvherre.pgsql >> >> and commit 3957b58b8885441c8d03bc1cfc00e47cf8cd7975. Part of this code >> >> duplicates that ... >> > >> > Is that bad? >> >> If you are expressing a concern about who wrote this code, I took >> Amit's word for it that he did. > > I'm just saying that the problem at hand is already solved for a related > feature, so ISTM this new code should use the recently added routine > rather than doing the same thing in a different way. Oh, I see. Amit, thoughts? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: