Re: random failing builds on spoonbill - backends not exiting...
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: random failing builds on spoonbill - backends not exiting... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobhPCgDjtRP-omYbmrs8MoZWL8uUYFNhb9HDNrs=znYDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: random failing builds on spoonbill - backends not exiting... (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Friday, June 22, 2012 08:51:55 PM Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner >> >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >> > sending a manual kill -15 to either of them does not seem to make them >> > exit either... >> > >> > I did some further investiagations with robert on IM but I don't think >> > he has any further ideas other than that I have a weird OS :) >> > It seems worth noticing that this is OpenBSD 5.1 on Sparc64 which has a >> > new threading implementation compared to older OpenBSD versions. >> >> I remarked to Stefan that the symptoms seem consistent with the idea >> that the children have signals blocked. But I don't know how that >> could happen. > You cannot block sigkill. Obviously. The issue is: the postmaster apparently sent SIGTERM (15) to all of these children, and yet they're not dead; and a manual SIGTERM doesn't kill them either. I'm sure SIGKILL (9) would do the trick, but then it's not a clean shutdown. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: