Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobgWHcXDcChX2+BqJDk2dkPVF85ZrJFhUyHHQmw8diTpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Re: [HACKERS] Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the review. > > Moved to CF 2017-03, the 8th commit fest of this patch. I think eight is enough. Committed with some cosmetic changes. I think the turning point for this somewhat-troubled patch was when we realized that, while results were somewhat mixed on whether it improved performance, wait event monitoring showed that it definitely reduced contention significantly. However, I just realized that in both this case and in the case of group XID clearing, we weren't advertising a wait event for the PGSemaphoreLock calls that are part of the group locking machinery. I think we should fix that, because a quick test shows that can happen fairly often -- not, I think, as often as we would have seen LWLock waits without these patches, but often enough that you'll want to know. Patch attached. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: