Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobgN_eBoWYmYKqZdGSiWBbJ4_7_CxwnCyWHmq2e4rTQMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop] (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >* How about making it --help=variables instead of --help-variables? >> >> -1, help is not a variable to be assigned imho > > I don't think variable assignment is a good mental model for long > commandline arguments. And it's not like I'm the first to come up with > an extensible --help. Check e.g. gcc. > > But anyway, I guess I've lost that argument. I think it mostly depends on how far we think we might extend it. I mean, --help-variables is fine as a parallel to --help. But if we're eventually going to have help for 12 things, --help=TOPIC is a lot better than 12 separate switches. So +0.5 for your proposal from me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: