On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:29 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's v2 patch, passing progress report interval as an input to
> begin_progress_report_phase() so that the processes can use their own
> intervals(hard-coded or GUC) if they wish to not use the generic GUC
> log_progress_report_interval.
I don't think we should rename the GUC to be more generic. I like it
the way that it is.
I also think you should extend this patch series with 1 or 2
additional patches showing where else you think we should be using
this infrastructure.
If no such places exist, this is pointless.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com