Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmobeqs5tE8h-_PF_Orp67kNJdRJ9b4pqDYQr1WjLT24ZEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3 (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 12:52 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > table_open(childRelId, ...) would lock any "ALTER TABLE <childRelId> DROP CONSTRAINT" > > > already. Not sure I understand your concern here. > > > > I believe this is not true. This would take a lock on the table, not > > the constraint itself. > > I agree that it would not lock the constraint itself. What I meant to say is that > , nevertheless, the constraint can not be dropped. Indeed, the "ALTER TABLE" > necessary to drop the constraint (ALTER TABLE <childRelId> DROP CONSTRAINT) would > be locked by the table_open(childRelId, ...). Ah, right. So, I was assuming that, with either this version of your patch or the earlier version, we'd end up locking the constraint itself. Was I wrong about that? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: