Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobemA6zL35DDf98ZWKEV_XFDTa+=3C=3Uh=D2biK=qOuw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData()
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > >Do you think it makes sense to check the performance by increasing CLOG buffers (patch for same is posted in Speed upClog thread [1]) >as that also relieves contention on CLOG as per the tests I have done? > > Along with clog patches and save snapshot, I also applied Amit's increase clog buffer patch. Below is the benchmark results. I think that we really shouldn't do anything about this patch until after the CLOG stuff is settled, which it isn't yet. So I'm going to mark this Returned with Feedback; let's reconsider it for 9.7. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: