Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobeRXnG3bjczOfKhNbjdsFk0M9iX+ePOZT1Jd1gmXdSMQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings
Re: IMMUTABLE and PARALLEL SAFE function markings |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 8:49 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote: > I'm a bit more concerned by the fact that inlining the function isn't > affecting the parallel safety of the query - the fact that parallel > safety is being checked prior to inlining means that if inlining > *introduces* a parallel hazard, it will go unnoticed? If a function is marked parallel-safe but internally calls parallel-restricted or parallel-unsafe functions, it wasn't really parallel-safe in the first place. So I think that if inlining introduces a parallel hazard, the user has mislabeled some functions and any resulting injury is self-inflicted. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: