Re: Writable foreign tables: how to identify rows
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Writable foreign tables: how to identify rows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobdfzdSaiczEc=Y4UbanTfTqQk4dDA8R3JZRDD8_G0LYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Writable foreign tables: how to identify rows (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Writable foreign tables: how to identify rows
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > On the other hand, I don't have a problem with decreeing that > non-Postgres FDWs need to use PK row identification in the first > release; which would be the consequence if we don't do anything about > allowing new system columns in 9.3. We will certainly need that style > of row identification to be written and tested anyway. It won't stop > us from extending things later. Oh, I didn't realize that was how it was going to work out. That seems very reasonable to me. There is a performance problem with forcing DELETE FROM ft WHERE nonkey = 5 to be pushed to the remote side as SELECT pk FROM ft WHERE nonkey = 5 followed by DELETE FROM ft WHERE pk = $1 for each pk value returned by the SELECT, which sounds like it's what will happen under this system. But I don't have any problem leaving that as future work. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: