Re: Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobcHRgLhabnYVLBX+1VfQBeidUz7mGTHJfzxh=n7djaJQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Note the following comment in src/backend/commands/vacuumlazy.c:lazy_scan_heap() > > 1088 /* If no indexes, make log report that lazy_vacuum_heap > would've made */ > 1089 if (vacuumed_pages) > 1090 ereport(elevel, > > Just wondering if it would read better as: > > 1088 /* Make the log report that lazy_vacuum_heap would've made > had there been no indexes */ > > Is that correct? No. Your rewrite means the opposite of what the comment means now. vacuumed_pages will be non-zero only if the relation does NOT have indexes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: