Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list()
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobavePOgpAvBar6Ej2AsPMvcHgaqkFgsuCqBgibr45L8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list() (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: performance issue in remove_from_unowned_list()
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 1:53 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2019-Feb-08, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > I'm wondering if we should just get rid of all such optimizations, and > > make the unowned list doubly-linked (WIP patch attached, needs fixing > > the comments etc.). > > +1 for that approach. +1 for me, too. > Did you consider using a dlist? Maybe that is worthwhile, but this is a smaller change, which I think should count for quite a bit. Nothing keeps somebody from doing the dlist change as a separate patch, if desired. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: