Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoba-ZN2SQuWV8sy3_tYzKsUio=94+EufSnamj45DunJ8A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote: > 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta: >> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>: >>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent? >> I believe I already did. See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784. > > I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run > so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get > converted so the whole source tree is consistent. Oh, I see. Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh in. The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me either. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: