Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob_WSEo1xNKHz6xZB4NLGfwAa9TTsf4_edA7zJtOXbzjQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining? ("Regina Obe" <lr@pcorp.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Regina Obe <lr@pcorp.us> wrote: > When you back up the database, it would create a backup with this line: > > SET search_path = public, pg_catalog; > --your create materialized view here > > When you restore even if your database has search_paths set, your materialized view will not come back and will error outwith: > > ERROR: function _helper(box, box) does not exist > LINE 2: SELECT $1 && $2 AND _helper($1,$2) = 0; > ^ > HINT: No function matches the given name and argument types. You might need to add explicit type casts. > QUERY: > SELECT $1 && $2 AND _helper($1,$2) = 0; Hmm. The meaning of funcs.inline depends on the search_path, not just during dump restoration but all the time. So anything uses it under a different search_path setting than the normal one will have this kind of problem; not just dump/restore. I don't have a very good idea what to do about that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: