Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob_WGK+vKzE6FmrMmuwuv4myntfRAkEbo+tsDt9xUwCLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I ran the postgres_fdw regression test with no sleep two times in a >> CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS-enabled build, and then the regression test with >> the sleep (60 seconds) two times, but I couldn't reproduce that in both >> cases. I suspect the changes in the order of the RETURNING output there >> was still caused by autovacuum kicking in partway through the run. So >> to make the regression test more stable against autovacuum, I'd propose >> to modify the regression test to disable autovacuum for the remote table >> (ie "S 1"."T 1") (and perform VACUUM ANALYZE to that table manually >> instead) in hopes of getting that fixed. Attached is a patch for that. >> I think changes added by the previous patch wouldn't make sense >> anymore, so I removed those changes. > > Ping? We're still seeing those failures on jaguarundi. This is another patch that got past me. Committed now. I'd be lying if I said I was filled with confidence that this was going to fix it, but I don't know what to do other than keep tinkering with it until we find something that works. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: