Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobYzJqxi5CT_yw7+1KULDiTc-DXTi8hZqVkin6ee0Mm2A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote: > I reviewed your patch. I think it is in good shape, my two main remarks > (name of n_unremovable_tup and a remark about documentation at the end of > this review) are highly subjective and I wouldn't spend time on it unless > other people have the same opinion. I share your opinion; it's not obvious to me what this means either. I guess this is a dumb question, but why don't we remove all the dead tuples? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: