Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobWe0xTtbf7Qx9dgC3dqLKtbx9k-8PJ+AOHJrwHEooang@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Pluggable storage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote: > For some other > storage engine, if we maintain the older version in different storage, > undo for example, and don't require a new index entry, should we still > call it HOT-chain? I would say, emphatically, no. HOT is a creature of the existing heap. If it's creeping into storage APIs they are not really abstracted from what we have currently. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: