Re: [HACKERS] an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] an outdated comment for hash_seq_init. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobU=F1JtGZ+bL91D7sE2+cBybmJ+WMQdmTT0cyV2dvO0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] an outdated comment for hash_seq_init. (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] an outdated comment for hash_seq_init.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > While I looked into dynahash.c, I found that the following > sentense became outdated by 5dfc198. The commit removed the only > usage of hash_freeze(). > >> * NOTE: it is possible to use hash_seq_init/hash_seq_search without any >> * worry about hash_seq_term cleanup, if the hashtable is first locked against >> * further insertions by calling hash_freeze. This is used by nodeAgg.c, >> * wherein it is inconvenient to track whether a scan is still open, and >> * there's no possibility of further insertions after readout has begun. > > The attached patch removes the sentence begins with "This is used > by..". Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: