Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobTZHXfMPMAU6NNGWUNEeM8ZtVCAS2r5QWjU60L6t3KGw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > Your intuition here is better than mine, but I am still missing > something here. If we keep the buffer pinned, then there will be very > few pin/unpin cycles here, so I don't see where the contention would > come from (any more than there is contention pinning the root of an > index). Based on previous measurements, I think there *is* contention pinning the root of an index. Currently, I believe it's largely overwhelmed by contention from other sources, such as the buffer manager lwlocks and the very-evil ProcArrayLock. However, I believe that as we fix those problems, this will start to percolate up towards the top of the heap. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: