Re: Hash support for row types
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash support for row types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobT6e4uV6JNMND7oM23Q8HUAgyEP4R1w9-G9w9jT0stDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash support for row types (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash support for row types
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:10 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2020-10-20 01:32, Andres Freund wrote: > > How does this deal with row types with a field that doesn't have a hash > > function? Erroring out at runtime could cause queries that used to > > succeed, e.g. because all fields have btree ops, to fail, if we just have > > a generic unconditionally present hash opclass? Is that an OK > > "regression"? > > Good point. There is actually code in the type cache that is supposed > to handle that, so I'll need to adjust that. Do we need to worry about what happens if somebody modifies the opclass/opfamily definitions? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: