Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobSnR5srV-00yKS2-R66FMZ_SZdX=p-5cdxTC9NFxfxjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think maybe we should rename the functions to element_allocate, >> element_free, and element_allocator_ctx, or something like that. The >> current names aren't capitalized consistently with other things in >> this module, and putting the word "element" in there would make it >> more clear what the purpose of this thing is. > > Fixed as per the suggestion Eh, not really. You changed the memory context to be called element_allocator_ctx, rather than changing the args passed to the element allocator to have that name, which is what I had in mind. I did some assorted renaming and other cosmetic improvements and committed 0002. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: