Re: Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobShFz3T01ckke3ReHCqWN5=iM+eoLHew537pbj-tyDYg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd (Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can I assume relation would not be invalid during from ExecutorRun to ExecutorEnd
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:10 AM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. During the ExecutorRun & ExecutorEnd, the relcache will never by invalidated, if not > the old relation->balabala will be lost. I assume this is correct since I didn't see any places > where we handle such changes in Executor code. It's not correct. We accept invalidation messages in a number of different code paths, including whenever we acquire a lock on a relation. That doesn't typically happen in the middle of a query, but that's just because most queries don't happen to do anything that would make it happen. They can, though. For example, the query can call a user-defined function that accesses a table not previously touched by the transaction. Or a built-in function that does the same thing, like table_to_xml(). -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: