Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 1:46 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Trying to move this along, where would be a good place to define
> OPENSSL_API_COMPAT?  The only place that's shared between frontend and
> backend code is c.h.  The attached patch does it that way.

So, if we go this way, does that mean that we're not going to pursue
removing dependencies on the deprecated interfaces? I wonder if we
really ought to be doing that too, with preprocessor conditionals.
Otherwise, aren't we putting ourselves in an uncomfortable situation
when the deprecated stuff eventually goes away upstream?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company