Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobOqZt1FG2YpmvpUoOBRPHL5vjnHy8cay6fs_h1pM-hLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a
separate tranche.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>>> It's stupid that we keep spending time and energy figuring out which >>>> shared memory data structures require alignment and which ones don't. >>>> Let's just align them *all* and be done with it. The memory cost >>>> shouldn't be more than a few kB. > >>> I think such a proposal should come with a measurement, not just >>> speculation about what it costs. > >> About 6kB with default settings. See below. > > Sold, then. Excellent. Done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: