Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobOZg1HTw0P3V_2Kt_vp1zrfs_hNZVjxQZheUVutehWzw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7 (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-02-24 17:06:53 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> - heap_page_prune_opt(scan->rs_rd, buffer, RecentGlobalXmin); >> + if (IsSystemRelation(scan->rs_rd) >> + || RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding(scan->rs_rd)) >> + heap_page_prune_opt(scan->rs_rd, buffer, RecentGlobalXmin); >> + else >> + heap_page_prune_opt(scan->rs_rd, buffer, RecentGlobalDataXmin); >> >> Instead of changing the callers of heap_page_prune_opt() in this way, >> I think it might be better to change heap_page_prune_opt() to take >> only the first two of its current three parameters; everybody's just >> passing RecentGlobalXmin right now anyway. > > I've changed stuff this way, and it indeed looks better. > > I am wondering about the related situation of GetOldestXmin() > callers. There's a fair bit of duplicated logic in the callers, before > but especially after this patchset. What about adding 'Relation rel' > parameter instead of `allDbs' and `systable'? That keeps the logic > centralized and there's been a fair amount of talk about vacuum > optimizations that could also use it. > It's a bit sad that that requires including rel.h from procarray.h... > > What do you think? Isolated patch attached. Seems reasonable to me. + * considered, but for non-shared non-shared relations that's not required, Duplicate word. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: