Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobNQeCTY2v+tLzO54y8BLUrp+ECaKaUxs+Mp2Hb-BKCxA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use? |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Do you have any suggestion as to how we should transmit the blacklist to >> parallel workers? > > How about storing them in the a dshash table instead of dynahash? > Similar to how we're now dealing with the shared typmod registry stuff? > It should be fairly simple to now simply add a new struct Session member > shared_enum_whatevs_table. Yeah, that approach seems worth exploring. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: