Re: log_newpage header comment
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: log_newpage header comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobLLnnzjjd+hcVxZ4nPvmaawZ1NhUgdH7AXBvwb61B08w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | log_newpage header comment (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote: >>>Uh... no. The whole point of doing things in shared buffers is that >>>you don't have to write and fsync the buffers immediately. Instead, >>>buffer evicting handles that stuff for you. > > So you mean to say that there exists operations where Xlog is not required > even though it marks the buffer as dirty for later eviction. Correct. >>>I don't see why it's any different from log_newpage() in that regard. >>>That data is initialized before being written, as well, but someone >>>contemplated the possible need to write a page of all zeros. > > The comment above the code indicates that "the page is uninitialized". > Does the code consider page with all zero's as uninitialized or the comment > is not > appropriate. Yes, all zeroes = uninitialized. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: