Re: FDW system columns
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FDW system columns |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobKfc70rJDu-89Kt6ft+BaKnNe80KjHQeHEkUFuW+9yGg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: FDW system columns (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: FDW system columns
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>> If there seems to be a consensus on removing system column from foreign >>> tables, I'd like to work on this issue. Attached is a halfway patch, >>> and ISTM there is no problem so far. >> >> >> I can say that at least PgAdmin doesn't use these columns. > > So we still have all of these columns for foreign tables. I've tested > Hanada-san's patch and it removes all of the system columns. Could we > consider applying it, or has a use-case for them since been > discovered? Not to my knowledge, but Hanada-san described his patch as a "halfway patch", implying that it wasn't done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: