Re: Command Triggers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Command Triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobKRKRLv3Kb758wH1WrQ93g6cOorYhV-i_xCVCtnFwdKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011: >> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub >> commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's >> a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later. > > I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility > for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature. That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail that we might want to change at some point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: